KimStanleyRobinson.info

The reference site for Kim Stanley Robinson

KSR Down Under, Part II

Written by

in

Kim Stanley Robinson delivered his Guest of Honour Speech at the WorldCon/AussieCon 4. Since interviewer Sean Williams was unable to make it, Stan conducted both the roles of interviewer and interviewee, jacket on/jacket off style!

An audio of the speech can already be found here (direct mp3 link), courtesy of writer and journalist Gary Kemble. Gary also wrote a piece on the speech for the Australian news service ABC News, which you can find here.

Stan took the opportunity to speak about the utopian process, and how important it is to believe, collectively, that a better future is possible, in order to achieve it.

“The more visions we have of a future where things are going right in some large sense, the more we believe in our hearts that we’re headed that way as a consensus culture.”

However, not much of utopia is found in fiction and literature, compared to dystopias that populate the SF genre (and in its filmic counterpart in particular!):

“The truth is it’s really hard to write those kind of stories and we don’t see enough of them,” he said.

“Because of the utopian problem – the blueprint is boring whereas the disaster is more exciting. Making [sustainability] exciting is a double-bind, a particular problem that I wish more people would attack.”

“Economics is the astrology of our time.”

See previous post for the detailed program of events. Stay tuned for more.

Comments

3 responses to “KSR Down Under, Part II”

  1. Sue Bursztynski Avatar

    I am so very glad I heard Stan at the Melbourne Writers’ Festival. It was a very enjoyable session – and as I’ve been sick, I had a dreadful coughing fit at the GoH speech at Aussiecon. I had to leave, to avoid disturbing others’ enjoyment of the speech. 🙁

    I hope he had a great time in Australia! 😀

  2. Ralph Haygood Avatar

    “Economics is the astrology of our time.” To the degree that much of it is propaganda on behalf of plutocrats, it’s arguably even worse than astrology.

    In college, I focused on physics, math, and computer science, which I found interesting, and ignored economics, which struck me as boring and mired in politics. However, I’ve recently concluded I need to learn something about economics, so I’ve been reading, for example, Krugman and Wells’ introductory textbook. From smart, honest economists like Krugman and Wells, I find the reasoning generally sound but the premises somewhat unsatisfying; basic ideas such as the scarcity of resources seem to me to deserve more scrutiny than I’ve yet encountered. As Galbraith remarked in his history of economics, economic theory tends to be dominated by economic arrangements that historically existed or currently exist rather than alternatives that could exist. I appreciate the need to understand our current situation, but it’s increasingly apparent that we need to look well beyond it to have much chance of a decent future.

    1. Ralph Haygood Avatar

      …increasingly apparent that we need to look well beyond it to have much chance of a decent future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *